![adobe camera raw lens profiles adobe camera raw lens profiles](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/e4/cc/75/e4cc75f7c47235af97bde5989034a4e0.jpg)
If you follow the link provided in Pieter Kers' original post, you can read various reasons why some Lightroom users are requesting the ability to disable the automatic application of lens correction metadata.
![adobe camera raw lens profiles adobe camera raw lens profiles](https://forum44.djicdn.com/data/attachment/forum/201701/25/111059khhs2x5z5g7g2g5l.gif)
ADOBE CAMERA RAW LENS PROFILES FREE
This is conjecture on my part, but I can't believe there is any technical obstacle to making the application of these metadata optional.īecause there is no such thing as a free lunch. Or, perhaps more accurately, make it appear better to the vast majority of users at the expense of inconveniencing the small minority who might have a specific reason for making their own geometry modifications. Perhaps the camera manufacturers are sharing proprietary maker notes metadata with Adobe in return for Adobe's agreement to apply the included lens correction values as a mandatory adjustment.įrom the camera manufacturer's perspective, this presumably would make the quality of the lens appear better than it actually is. Obviously, it would be preferable for Adobe to offer this as an option in the Lens Corrections panel. The difference in geometry is apparent even in these low resolution samples. I've attached two JPEGs generated, respectively, from an original Fuji X-T3 raw file and a converted DNG with the lens corrections removed. Then process each DNG with the McGuffog&Company DNG Cleaner application, selecting the options "Remove all opcodes" and "If a file already exists: overwrite." Finally, import the converted and correction-stripped files into Lightroom. That said, first create DNG versions of your raw files with the Adobe DNG Converter. I haven't done exhaustive testing and it is possible that removing the lens corrections in this manner will break some other Lightroom functionality.the only application I have found that works is restricted to MacOS.Edited by chanrobi, 03 July 2020 - 01:43 PM.It is possible to strip the embedded lens correction metadata, but I know much of the world uses DSS, but I don't, so solutions must come from elsewhere.Ībsolutely check out Rawtherapee, it's free. I'd hoped to get away from futzing with this each and every time I do a shoot. I think I've been forced to go the ACR approach. :-) Just looking for a short cut to assist in both AP and daytime. I do use the RedCat in daytime photography, too, so it wasn't a *completely* ignorant-sounding request on my part. Unsurprisingly neither WO nor Adobe have gotten back to me about this, which is what prompted me to post here. Thanks again, one and all, for taking the time to answer my inquiry. I'm new around here, but I've read enough to see that should I become involved in that particular war it would definitely impact my "precious free time". If I'm using the same setup day after day, why should I have to make the same adjustments day after day.needless and wasteful. I personally don't mind hard work, unless it is needlessly repetitive (like making corrections on every single shoot). I don't want to spend my precious free time doing something that doesn't need to be done.Įxactly. The closer I can get to just shooting lights + stacking + stretch, the better. Heck according to r.clark you don't even need to shoot darks or anything like that. I can use the included lens profiles in rawtherapee when I use my stock Canon lenses, bingo don't need to shoot flats. You won't need to shoot flats.Īnything to make the post processing train go quicker is a win.
![adobe camera raw lens profiles adobe camera raw lens profiles](https://www.diyphotography.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/irix-lens-cc.jpg)
Because if there is a lens profile, someone has already done the hard work for you.